I built this small Grok bot team for the point in a project when the application is real, but the picture is not complete yet. Requirements are moving. Evidence is scattered across tickets, designs, code, and conversations. Decisions still need a human owner.
The ten templates below give me focused roles to delegate to while I gather that context. They do not replace a product or engineering team, and they do not make the final call. I use them to investigate a bounded question, expose gaps, and return something concrete that I can compare with the rest of the evidence.
Connect the source of truth first
A role-based bot is only useful when it can see the same current context as the people doing the work.
Start by connecting Linear or whichever project-management tool your team uses. Give the bot access to the relevant project, tickets, and supporting material instead of pasting an incomplete summary into every conversation.
If the tool does not have a native connector, use its API or an MCP connection. The route matters less than the boundary:
- Start read-only and grant only the projects or records required for the task.
- Keep tokens, credentials, customer data, and private keys out of prompts.
- Treat write access as a separate decision. Scope it narrowly and review what the bot is allowed to change.
- Keep the project-management system as the source of truth after a decision is made.
That setup turns the bots into participants in the same workflow instead of isolated chat windows.
Business and product bots
These bots help me look at the work before it becomes an engineering task—or when a ticket needs more product context.
GTM
Use this role to examine go-to-market questions, launch assumptions, and the business context surrounding a feature.
Design-focused
Use this role to review flows, interaction questions, design constraints, and missing user-experience decisions.
Open the Design-focused bot in Grok →
Product Owner
Use this role to organize product context, identify ticket gaps, and turn open questions into decisions the delivery team can act on.
Open the Product Owner bot in Grok →
Head of Product
Use this role for product-level tradeoffs, priorities, and questions that cross more than one workstream.
Open the Head of Product bot in Grok →
Engineering bots
These roles help me examine implementation paths without asking one generic assistant to pretend it is every kind of engineer at once.
Backend Engineer
Use this role for backend boundaries, API and data questions, service behavior, and implementation risks.
Open the Backend Engineer bot in Grok →
Mobile Engineer — Expo focused
Use this role for Expo and React Native constraints, mobile implementation considerations, and platform-specific questions.
Open the Mobile Engineer bot in Grok →
Engineering Lead
Use this role to surface dependencies, sequencing questions, technical risks, and coordination needs across the engineering work.
Open the Engineering Lead bot in Grok →
QA bots
I keep QA split by testing concern. A functional review, an accessibility review, and a performance review ask different questions and need different evidence.
Functional Web Manual QA
Use this role to inspect acceptance gaps, functional paths, exploratory risks, and the observable behavior a tester needs to verify.
Open the Functional Web Manual QA bot in Grok →
Accessibility Tester
Use this role to identify accessibility checkpoints, semantic and keyboard concerns, and places that need evidence against accessibility expectations.
Open the Accessibility Tester bot in Grok →
Performance Tester
Use this role to frame performance risks, decide what should be measured, and separate assumptions from evidence.
Open the Performance Tester bot in Grok →
The delegation loop I use
The value is not in opening ten chats. It is in giving the right role one clear job.
- Bring current evidence. Start with the ticket, design, code, constraints, and what is still unknown.
- Choose one role. Delegate to the bot closest to the decision instead of broadcasting the same vague prompt everywhere.
- Define the output. Ask for a risk list, clarified acceptance criteria, implementation questions, or another specific deliverable.
- Compare and reconcile. When two roles disagree, keep the conflict visible and resolve it against the evidence.
- Record the decision. Put the outcome back into Linear or the team's source of truth so the next person does not have to reconstruct it.
I remain responsible for the context, the tradeoffs, and the final decision. The bots make the work easier to divide; they do not make accountability disappear.
How these bots were created
Every bot in this set started with Dr. Eggbot, a Grok bot creator I use to turn a role into a more focused assistant with clearer qualities and working approaches.
The result is a practical starting roster, not a finished organization. Add the roles you need, connect them to the context they are allowed to use, and give each one a job narrow enough to verify.